You will perplex when you observe the dozens of potential 3D print infill pattern options offered across several slicers. It became easier to choose which pattern to employ after recognizing that every pattern has a purpose.

3D print infill pattern is a crucial aspect of your print, whether the pattern’s objective is strength, flexibility, or simply to look beautiful. After you’ve decided on a print, you’ll need to figure out which one is best for your needs.

Is infill needed 3D printing?

If you’re new to 3D printing. You might ask what infill is for. As the printer develops each layer, infill offers internal support for the 3D print. Printing the upper layers without infill would be problematic because the plastic would sag over the empty areas of the print.

In addition to the printing method, infill impacts the finished product’s strength and feel. You should have a broad concept of the pattern and percentage you want to employ once you know what your print will be used for.

What is the best 3D print infill pattern to use?

I will categorize each infill pattern into one of five groups for this article. Each category has a specific application, and certain infill patterns may have numerous varieties.

Keep in mind that everything here is based on our experiences and findings from other people’s testing on the internet. Hundreds of different tests have been conducted on these patterns. Therefore I encourage you to do your own. Also, strength of a 3D print depends percentage of infill. In this article we assumed that average infill percentage (20%) is used for each item.

1. Low Strength

hand is holding a 3d printed object with lightning infill
Lightning Infill Cura – Source: reddit.com

Low-strength models and trinkets are what you’ll find here. These prints will most likely sit on your shelf or desk and will not be used.

These parts will likely have a low infill percentage to save time and money. Low-strength patterns usually take the least amount of time to print.

These prints will be focused on speed, which low-strength prints thrive at. This design is ideal for printer calibration prints because they take the least time.

2. Medium Strength

3D printed cube with gyrpid infill and grey PLA
3D printed cube with gyrpid infill and grey PLA

Medium-density infill is best for pieces that will get minor wear and tear and items you print for others. You could offer customers low-strength parts, but they won’t last very long.

When using a medium-strength pattern, the pieces should be able to withstand a light beating before being completely destroyed. Dropping it on the floor isn’t a problem. Still, heavy use will quickly wear it out.

3. High Strength

 

These are prints that will be used frequently or for a specific purpose. Items with moving parts, clips, hooks, drone bodies, and anything else that needs to withstand moderate force fall into this category.

Plastic filaments are obviously not as robust as metal filaments. Still, they are a low-cost option that can last a long time, depending on the application.

High infill settings are commonly used to print high-strength items. Parts that require extraordinary strength may require 100 percent infill, at which point the pattern becomes irrelevant.

4. Flexibility

TPU (flexible) filaments excel with these infill patterns, whereas PLA and ABS are rigid polymers. Grid patterns, for example, are commonly used as infill patterns because they do not have overlapping lines.

You generally won’t have to worry about these unless you’re printing with TPU. However, some of the flexible infill patterns look fantastic in time lapses.

You could undoubtedly print TPU with any pattern, although some feel more flexible than others.

5. Vanity

Vanity patterns serve no other aim than to make you appear excellent in front of the camera. These designs are primarily wacky forms and lines that offer little support.

However, some of these vanity prints can also be used as strength prints. However, because these prints take longer, they are generally not worth it for the usual print.

Due to the insane movements, the printer has to make on each layer, it also takes longer to print than other patterns. Stick to the conventional patterns unless you’re conducting a time lapse or just showing off some astonishing patterns to your pals.

Three slicers’ 3D Infill Pattern Options of Most Popular 3 Slicers

Infill patterns will vary depending on whatever slicer you select. Some patterns are shared by all slicers, while others are pretty unique.

In this section, I’ll give you a quick rundown of the infill patterns used by three slicers. If you want even more information, I’ll go through several regularly used patterns in further depth after this section.

Also, you will see some images that show the various patterns each slicer offers.

 

Simplify3D

3D Infill Patterns in Simplified3D
3D Infill Patterns in Simplified3D – Source: The 3D Bros

While Simplify3D has the smallest number of infill patterns, it contains the ones you’ll need the most.
It obviously needs to include a lot more patterns for a paid program. It does not, however, lack any other options. If you need some interesting-looking patterns for time-lapses, you might wish to look at the other slicers’ patterns.

  • Low Strength
    • Wiggle
  • Medium Strength
    • Rectilinear
    • Fast honeycomb
    • Full honeycomb
  • High Strength
    • Grid
    • Triangular
  • Flexibility
    • Wiggle
  • Vanity
    • Wiggle

 

Cura

Cura 3D Infill Patterns
Cura 3D Infill Patterns – Source: Ultimaker

For infill patterns, Cura offers fewer options than PrusaSlicer. Still, some are so identical that you won’t utilize many of them.

Because it’s a free program, you may use it in conjunction with PrusaSlicer to try out a variety of new patterns.

  • Low Strength
    • Lines
    • Lightning
  • Medium Strength
    • Octet
    • Quarter Cubic
    • Gyroid
  • High Strength
    • Cubic
    • Cubic Subdivision (not included in patterns image)
    • Triangles
    • Tri-Hexagon
    • Grid
  • Felixible
    • Concentric
    • Cross 3D
    • Cross
    • Lines
  • Vanity
    • Concentric
    • Cross 3D
    • Gyroid
    • Cubic Subdivision
    • Cubic
    • Octet

 

PrusaSlicer

Patterns for PrusaSlicer Infill
Patterns for PrusaSlicer Infill – Source: Prusa Knowladge Base

PrusaSlicer has the most pleasing infill patterns by a long shot. While most of them are vanity patterns, some can also be employed to strengthen prints.

Timelapses of some of these patterns appear to be really gratifying. The fact that the program is free adds to its appeal.

  • Low Strength
    • Rectangular Aligned
  • Medium Strength
    • Honeycomb
    • 3D Honeycomb
    • Gyroid
    • Grid (not included in patterns image)
    • Archimedian Chords
    • Octogram Spiral
  • High Strength
    • Cubic
    • Rectangular
    • Triangles
    • Stars
  • Felixible
    • Concentric
    • Cross 3D
    • Cross
  • Vanity
    • Concentric
    • Cross 3D
    • Gyroid
    • Archimedian Chords
    • Hilbert Chords
    • Octogram Spiral

The weight and durability of your print are greatly influenced by the density of your infill.

A 3D print with a low infill percentage will feel cheap and weak. But with a more significant percentage, an object will feel heavier and more robust.

The amount of infill you use when printing with flexible filaments determines how “squishy” the print feels. TPU infills with a higher density will be stiffer.

If you’re printing high-quality models for customers, you’ll want to employ a faster pattern and a greater infill density. This allows it to print more quickly while still feeling substantial enough not to appear cheap.

You can choose an infill pattern and density as soon as you know what the print will be used for. The strength patterns will be more prominent (sometimes even 100 percent ).

3D Printing: Stop Wasting Plastic on Infill Percentage

Try to print with as tiny an infill percentage as feasible for prints used for exhibition. Joel, the 3D Printing Nerd, created a fantastic video on the subject.

3D Print Infill Patterns for External Fill

The external fill pattern is another setting to keep an eye on. The way the printer fills in the top layers is affected by this setting.

Make your printer make some cool designs on the external top surface to give your prints a fantastic finish. You should generally keep this at the default level for detailed models.

Simplify3D only provides two external fill pattern options, but PrusaSlicer has seven. PrusaSlicer also lets you modify the fill patterns of the top and bottom layers separately, whereas Simplify3D does so by default.

Other Options for 3D Print Infill Pattern

Another 3D Print Infill Pattern option known as infill rotation may be found in your slicer settings, as you’ve indeed observed.

This feature causes the infill angle to change by rotating your infill to a particular degree per layer. This is useful for making more durable prints, and it also looks lovely in a timelapse.

To give extra strength, you can choose to add a solid diaphragm every x number of layers. Combining an infill is an option that helps to strengthen your print and ensure that the layers don’t separate as readily.

3D Print Infill Pattern:

Wiggle

3DBenchy in Simplify3D 3.0 User Interface
3DBenchy in Simplify3D 3.0 User Interface – Source: Flickr

Single wavy lines run from one side of the print to the other in this motif. For small objects, it’s the most popular Simplify3D pattern for both flexible printing and low-strength models.

For starters, it prints much faster than other infill patterns. It won’t make much difference for tiny prints, but it will for large ones.

The less movement the print head needs to perform, the better. There are fewer motions on each layer, and there is a lower probability of a print failure.

The second advantage is that it is compatible with flexible filaments. The parallel wavy lines compress wonderfully, making it feel more flexible. If you utilize the infill rotation setting, it’s also a fantastic filament to use with time-lapses.

3D Print Infill Pattern:

Honeycomb

Honeycomb 3D Print Infill Pattern
Honeycomb 3D Print Infill Pattern – Source: Prusa Knowladge Base

Honeycomb infills offer a very cool appearance. Aside from the apparent speed component, I don’t see much difference between quick honeycomb and full honeycomb.

While the 3D honeycomb is nothing remarkable for TPU filament, it can look pretty cool in time-lapses.

It’s not the fastest infill pattern, but it’s undoubtedly one of the most enjoyable. I’ll just stand there and watch my printer develop the perfect honeycomb shape in the interior of my print from time to time.

It’s also a medium-strength infill (some call it a high-strength infill), adding some strength, albeit not quite as much as Triangular.

3D Print Infill Pattern:

Gyroid

Gyroid 3D Print Infill Pattern
Gyroid 3D Print Infill Pattern – Source: Prusa Knowladge Base

One of the most remarkable patterns you may utilize is the Gyroid pattern. This rotating infill pattern is entertaining to watch in time lapses despite not being remarkably rapid.

This takes up a lot of space inside the model, making it less suitable for TPU. It’s a medium-strength filament that may be utilized in various types of prints.

Overall, it’s a fun filament to work with that doesn’t get old quickly.

3D Print Infill Pattern:

Triangular

Triangular 3D Print Infill Pattern
Triangular 3D Print Infill Pattern – Source: Prusa Knowladge Base

Triangular is probably the most common infill design I utilize. These designs are among the best for generating high-strength prints at fast rates.

The triangle shape is well-known for its geometric strength, evident in the print quality. Because the triangles can compress beautifully, it’s also a very flexible pattern.

Using this in a time lapse can quickly become old, but it’s a lovely pattern to use when unsure which one to perform.

Conclusion

Infill is a critical component of any print, but you must know how to use the correct settings. I believe Slic3r has the most unique 3D print infill pattern options. Use this slicer if you’re interested in time-lapses or want incredibly unique-looking patterns on your print.

Simplify3D falls very short, especially given its $150 price tag. Cura comes in second place, but some of the patterns are too similar. I prefer this PrusaSlicer for most printing, although I don’t use it for the fantastic pattern effects.

There aren’t many differences between any of these patterns. And you may use any of them to make your print successful. It all boils down to personal preference and the best print times.

Share.

Lexx covers 3D printing technologies as a journalist. He is a skilled product development engineer who is also a maker and enthusiastic about do-it-yourself projects. He loves looking after his adorably adorable kitty and spends his downtime 3D printing enhancements.

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply
Exit mobile version